What
are communicative and informative signals? what are the properties of human
language? Can other species acquire language?
To answer all these questions, we
have to recall what we have learned from chapter 2.
Generally, communicative signals are
intentional and carry meaning , whereas the Informative signals are not intentional but still carry meaning. For
example, when you tell someone i'm here
to teach you, then you are consider to be intentional. (intention : i'm a
teacher ), but when you say to some one i'm going to school, then its
considered as you giving information. (information: i must be a student). Also , Animals can be
informative and communicative too. For example, a bird may suddenly fly away at
the approach of a predator (information: we deduce that the bird must be
frightened), or A bird may make a loud squawk at the sight of a predator
(communication: Hey everyone, lookout! Something is going to eat us!!)
Now,
lets move on to the Properties of Human Language. Basically, There are six properties.
Displacement
Arbitrariness
Productivity
Cultural Transmission
Duality
• 1. Displacement: Humans can talk about the
past, present and future Yesterday, I saw a movie. Today, I’m staying home.
Next week, I’m…. Humans can talk about things that don’t exist or we can’t
see.Yesterday, Grandpa went to heaven... Tomorrow, the Tooth Fairy is coming...
• 2. Arbitrariness: There is no natural
connection between a word’s form and its meaning but with the possible
exception of onomatopoeic words.A written word doesn’t look like its meaning.
• 3.Productivity: Human vocabulary and
sentences are infinite, open-ended: We can create new words in our lexicon,
like texting, googling, new slang.We have a morphology (word-forming rules) and
a grammar (with sentence structure rules) which allow us to combine new words
in new structures and Infinite diversity in infinite combinations.
• 4. Cultural Transmission: We acquire our
speech from the environment we are raised in, our culture, which includes our
language, our accent, our expressions.While a meow is a meow is a meow,
wherever; it is instinctual, inborn.Some birds both are born with some calls
and songs instinctually and some are learned.
• 5. Duality: Human language is organized at
two levels: The sounds (PHONETICS) which carry no
individual meaning and the
combinations of sounds (PHONOLOGY and MORPHOLOGY) which carry
meaning. Economical: with a limited number of discrete sounds, we can produce an
infinite number of meanings.
After recalling all thees six properties, now let's answer our last
question. Can other species acquire language? when we say can other species acquire language, we are basically
talking about the animal languages. The
animal languages are those forms of animal communication that
are similar to human language. Animal
communication can be considered complex enough to be called a form of language
. Animal communication can also be evidenced through the use of lexigrams, in addition to signs. A lexigram represents a word
but is not necessarily indicative of the object referenced by the word. They
are symbols that correspond to objects and ideas and have been used by chimpanzee and bonobos to
express language. While the term "animal language" is widely used,
researchers agree that animal languages are not as complex or expressive as human
language.Some researchers including the linguist Charles Hockett , who
proposed a list of design features of Human Language, argue that there are
significant differences separating human language from animal communication even at its most
complex, and that the underlying principles are not related. Accordingly, Thomas A. Sebeok has
proposed not to use the term 'language' in case of animal sign systems. Others argue that
an evolutionary continuum exists between the communication methods these
animals use and human language. Examining this continuum could help explain how
humanity evolved its incredibly sophisticated proficiency for language.
Eventually,
it comes to question section. It's time to answer the most controversial and
interesting question ! My question is, is it fair or necessary to define animals communication abilities based on how well can they acquire human language. If its not, please explain with your reasons.
Such a good explanation about this interesting chapter! Anyway, as for me, I'm totally disagree any research or experiment towards animals. I wish that those researchers must stop their intention immediately. I think it was enough on what they did upon those chimpanzees before. For the sake of language acquisition purpose and something to do with potential research, this context would just torture that animals physically (overt) and mentally (covert). Obviously, human ability is more impressive rather than animals. It is unfair for any animals being selected under any research. Why I say so? As for human, language acquisition is transmitted naturally since childhood as well as having good communication skills along the way they grow up. At this context, I would say they acquire everything under natural approach. As for animals, I could say they were quite prominent on communicative signals. That is if under human guidance. In short, no guide no action. However, animals' ability is quite limited due to fixed reference capability which means they stick at just one particular circumstance. I cannot deny their ability, somehow I think just certain of them just could acquire human language. Even then, it will take such a long time to do so based on some experiments all this while. This context will just waste time as well as finance throughout the implementation of experiment.
ReplyDelete